Rodriguez v. TDCJ - Inst Div

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJuly 3, 1997
Docket96-20560
StatusUnpublished

This text of Rodriguez v. TDCJ - Inst Div (Rodriguez v. TDCJ - Inst Div) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rodriguez v. TDCJ - Inst Div, (5th Cir. 1997).

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 96-20560 Summary Calendar __________________

EUGENIO L. RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; EVANS, Sgt.,

Defendants-Appellees.

______________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (CA-H-94-2933) ______________________________________________ July 2, 1997

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Eugenio L. Rodriguez, Texas prisoner # 382692, appeals the

dismissal of his civil rights complaint, in which he alleged that

he had been denied adequate medical care. We cannot determine from

the record the basis of the court’s dismissal, be it for mootness,

justiciability, frivolousness, or failure to state a claim, because

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. the court dismissed the complaint for the reasons stated at a

Spears hearing, and the tape of the hearing is largely inaudible.

Consequently, we cannot determine whether the district court abused

its discretion in dismissing the complaint on the assurance that

certain future medical treatment would be provided to Rodriguez.

Accordingly, we REMAND the case to the district court for the

limited purpose of reconstructing the record as it pertains to the

Spears hearing to clarify the basis of the dismissal. See Fed. R.

App. P. 10(c) and (d). Following remand, the district court shall

return the case to this court for further proceedings.

LIMITED REMAND.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Rodriguez v. TDCJ - Inst Div, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-v-tdcj-inst-div-ca5-1997.