Rodriguez v. Streeval

District Court, W.D. Virginia·Decided May 24, 2021·No. 7:20-cv-00458·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION

DANNY ANGEL RODRIGUEZ, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Case No. 7:20CV00458 ) v. ) OPINION AND ORDER ) WARDEN JASON C. STREEVAL, ) By: James P. Jones ) United States District Judge Defendant. )

This matter is before me on plaintiff Danny Angel Rodriguez’s motion seeking reconsideration of the summary dismissal of this civil rights action under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). After review of the record, I must deny Rodriguez’s motion. In his complaint, Rodriguez alleged two claims, regarding (a) his prison security classification within the Federal Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) and (b) the alleged refusal by BOP staff to grant him credit for jail time previously served. The court concluded that the first claim failed for reasons previously expressed by another judge of this court in rejecting a prior habeas action raising the same claim. The court also found that Rodriguez’s second claim regarding credit for prior jail time served was barred under Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 487 (1994). For these reasons, the court summarily dismissed this Bivens case. In Rodriguez’s motion seeking reconsideration of the dismissal of this action, he fails to offer any ground requiring amendment or alteration of the Final Order.

For the reasons stated, it is ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion seeking reconsideration of the dismissal of this action, ECF No. 9, is DENIED. ENTER: May 24, 2021

/s/ JAMES P. JONES United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodriguez v. Streeval, (W.D. Va. 2021).

Rodriguez v. Streeval (Rodriguez v. Streeval) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Heck v. Humphrey
512 U.S. 477 (Supreme Court, 1994)