Rodriguez v. State

191 S.W.3d 909, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 4152, 2006 WL 1314135
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rodriguez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 129 S.W.3d 551
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 15, 2006·No. 05-06-00333-CR·Published

Opinion

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice LANG-MIERS.

Luis Rodriguez was charged in juvenile court with capital murder. Following a hearing, the trial judge waived the juvenile court’s jurisdiction and transferred appellant to criminal court. Appellant filed a notice of appeal from the transfer order. The State has filed a letter with this Court questioning our jurisdiction over the appeal. We agree with the State that we do not have jurisdiction.

A defendant may appeal an order certifying him to stand trial as an adult and transferring him to criminal court “only in conjunction with the appeal of a conviction or an order of deferred adjudication for the offense for which the defendant was transferred to criminal court.” Tex.Code Ceim. PeoC. ANN. art. 44.47(b) (Vernon Supp.2005) (emphasis added). Neither appellant’s notice of appeal nor the record reflect that the proceedings have resulted in either a judgment of conviction or deferred adjudication order. Accordingly, we have no jurisdiction over the appeal. See id.

We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodriguez v. State, 191 S.W.3d 909, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 4152, 2006 WL 1314135 (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

191 S.W.3d 909 (Rodriguez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.