Rodriguez v. State

11 S.W.3d 353, 2000 Tex. App. LEXIS 130
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rodriguez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 939 S.W.2d 211
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 6, 2000·No. No. 01-98-00402-CR·Published

Opinions

ORDER

ADELE HEDGES, Justice.

The Court today considered appellant’s motions for further rehearing, to recall the mandate, and to abate the appeal. These three motions are DENIED.

[354]*354A jury found appellant guilty of aggravated sexual assault of a child and assessed punishment of five years in prison. On June 24, 1999, we affirmed the judgment of the trial court. On July 19, 1999, we denied appellant’s motion for rehearing. This Court’s plenary power over our judgment expired on August 18, 1999, or 30 days after the motion for rehearing was denied. See Tex.R.App. P. 19.1(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodriguez v. State, 11 S.W.3d 353, 2000 Tex. App. LEXIS 130 (Tex. Ct. App. 2000).

11 S.W.3d 353 (Rodriguez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Henderson v. State
977 S.W.2d 605 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1998)
Herrin v. State
668 S.W.2d 896 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1984)