Rodriguez v. State
This text of 11 S.W.3d 353 (Rodriguez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
ORDER
The Court today considered appellant’s motions for further rehearing, to recall the mandate, and to abate the appeal. These three motions are DENIED.
[354]*354A jury found appellant guilty of aggravated sexual assault of a child and assessed punishment of five years in prison. On June 24, 1999, we affirmed the judgment of the trial court. On July 19, 1999, we denied appellant’s motion for rehearing. This Court’s plenary power over our judgment expired on August 18, 1999, or 30 days after the motion for rehearing was denied. See Tex.R.App. P. 19.1(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 S.W.3d 353, 2000 Tex. App. LEXIS 130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-v-state-texapp-2000.