Rodriguez v. State
This text of 86 A.3d 393 (Rodriguez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Alberto Rodriguez’s appeal from a Superior Court ruling denying his application for postconviction relief came before this Court in conference on the state’s confession of error. The state, after reviewing Rodriguez’s pre-briefing statement, concedes that the trial justice erred in summarily denying the application without first advising the applicant of his intent do to so and without providing him a meaningful opportunity to reply prior to summary dismissal as required by G.L.1956 § 10-9.1-6(b). The state further acknowledges that in order for an indigent, first-time applicant to have a meaningful opportunity to reply, he or she must be afforded counsel upon request. Campbell v. State, 56 A.3d 448, 459 (R.I.2012). Upon review of the record, the Court concludes that the confession of error should be accepted.
Accordingly, the applicant’s appeal is sustained. The papers in the case are remandéd to the Superior Court for appropriate hearing on the postconviction application at which the applicant, if he requests, shall be represented by counsel.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
86 A.3d 393, 2014 WL 1257783, 2014 R.I. LEXIS 33, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-v-state-ri-2014.