Rodriguez v. State
879 S.W.2d 692, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 869, 1994 WL 226799
Opinion
ORDER
Movant, James Rodriquez, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing.
The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value.
The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rodriguez v. State, 879 S.W.2d 692, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 869, 1994 WL 226799 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).
879 S.W.2d 692 (Rodriguez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.