Rodriguez v. State

Court of Claims of Illinois

Rodriguez v. State

33 Ill. Ct. Cl. 266, 1979 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 70

CourtCourt of Claims of Illinois

DecidedOctober 1, 1979

DocketNo. 79-CC-0358

StatusPublished

This text of 33 Ill. Ct. Cl. 266 (Rodriguez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Claims of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rodriguez v. State, 33 Ill. Ct. Cl. 266, 1979 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 70 (Ill. Super. Ct. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This matter comes before the Court upon motion of Claimant to reconsider order entered by this Court on March 14, 1979, Respondent’s objections to said motion, and reply of Claimant to Respondent’s objections.

In his motion to reconsider dismissal, Claimant took the position that the Court’s order of dismissal was not clear and that it needed clarification..

Respondent’s objection to Claimant’s motion to reconsider dismissal stated that Claimant must exhaust all other remedies before seeking a final determination of his claim, as required by section 25 of the Court of Claims Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 37, par. 439.24 — 5), and that Claimant has failed to exhaust all his remedies.

The Court calls Claimant’s attention to its order of March 14, 1979, which stated that this Court does not have jurisdiction to review a decision of an administrative agency of the State of Illinois.

For the two reasons above cited, the Court’s order of March 14, 1979, is hereby affirmed and Claimant’s motion for reconsideration is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI