Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Rodriguez v. State

Rodriguez v. State

688 So. 2d 1023, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1830, 1997 WL 91411
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rodriguez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 650 So. 2d 1111 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 5, 1997·No. No. 96-1883·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

As the defendant-appellant’s boilerplate motion for judgment of acquittal did not set forth the argument he now seeks to advance on appeal [based on L.J. v. State, 578 So.2d 360 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)], we conclude that the challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence is not preserved for appellate review. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.380(b); James v. State, 525 So.2d 426, 427 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Johnson v. State, 478 So.2d 885, 886 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Patterson v. State, 391 So.2d 344, 345 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Daley v. State, 374 So.2d 59 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); De La Cova v. State, 355 So.2d 1227, 1230 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodriguez v. State, 688 So. 2d 1023, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1830, 1997 WL 91411 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

688 So. 2d 1023 (Rodriguez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daley v. State
374 So. 2d 59 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Patterson v. State
391 So. 2d 344 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
De La Cova v. State
355 So. 2d 1227 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Johnson v. State
478 So. 2d 885 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
James v. State
525 So. 2d 426 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
L.J. v. State
578 So. 2d 360 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)