Rodriguez v. State

600 So. 2d 46, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7283, 1992 WL 139079
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 23, 1992·No. No. 92-141·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

We treat the State’s motion to relinquish jurisdiction as a confession of error. The State concedes that appellant Ruben Rodriguez was entitled to a hearing on the question of whether he had violated his furlough agreement. See Walker v. State, 578 So.2d 514, 515 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); see also Walker v. State, 599 So.2d 233 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992).

The court is, of course, free to reimpose the sentence of five years “[i]f no excuse for non-attendance and no unjustifiable arrest are established after remand....” 578 So.2d at 515.

Reversed and remanded for hearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodriguez v. State, 600 So. 2d 46, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7283, 1992 WL 139079 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

600 So. 2d 46 (Rodriguez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jackson v. State
639 So. 2d 1119 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)