Rodriguez v. State

483 So. 2d 557, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 506, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11484
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rodriguez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 441 So. 2d 1129
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 25, 1986·No. No. 85-1539·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of this appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings, we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted. State v. Enmund, 476 So.2d 165 (Fla.1985).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodriguez v. State, 483 So. 2d 557, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 506, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11484 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

483 So. 2d 557 (Rodriguez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
State v. Enmund
476 So. 2d 165 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)