Rodriguez v. State

390 So. 2d 143, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18090
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 12, 1980·No. No. 79-1880·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within [144]*144which to raise any points that he chose in support of this appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that, with respect to the merits, the appeal is wholly frivolous. The imposition of a three year term in prison as a condition of ten years probation in Case No. 72-5858 is reversed and that case only is remanded for resen-tencing on the authority of Villery v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission (Fla.1980) and Cunningham v. State, 385 So.2d 721 (Fla.3d DCA 1980). The public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted and the orders and judgments appealed are otherwise hereby affirmed.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodriguez v. State, 390 So. 2d 143, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18090 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

390 So. 2d 143 (Rodriguez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Graham v. State
396 So. 2d 269 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Spencer v. State
395 So. 2d 1263 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Williams v. State
403 So. 2d 430 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Gonzalez v. State
392 So. 2d 334 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)