Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Rodriguez v. State

Rodriguez v. State

298 So. 2d 205, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8867
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rodriguez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6608 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 31, 1974·No. No. 72-175·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It appearing that the state made no effort to comply with the wiretap minimization requirements of F.S. § '934.09(5), the judgments are hereby reversed on the authority of Rodriguez v. State, Fla.1974, 297 So.2d 15.

BOARDMAN, Acting C. J., GRIMES, J., and DAKAN, STEPHEN L., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodriguez v. State, 298 So. 2d 205, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8867 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

298 So. 2d 205 (Rodriguez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rodriguez v. State
297 So. 2d 15 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1974)