Rodriguez v. Stanfield
This text of Rodriguez v. Stanfield (Rodriguez v. Stanfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed April 17, 2019. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D19-117 Lower Tribunal No. 19-262 ________________
Milagros Rodriguez, Appellant,
vs.
Griselda Stanfield, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Michaelle Gonzalez-Paulson, Judge.
Milagros Rodriguez, in proper person.
Walter J. Harvey, School Board Attorney, and Jeff James, Assistant School Board Attorney, for appellee.
Before EMAS, C.J., and LOGUE and HENDON, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Upon our review of the record and the initial brief, we affirm on the
authority of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a) (providing: “After
service of the initial brief . . . , the court may summarily affirm the order to be
reviewed if the court finds that no preliminary basis for reversal has been
demonstrated.”)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rodriguez v. Stanfield, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-v-stanfield-fladistctapp-2019.