Rodriguez v. Serge Elevators Co.

272 A.D.2d 463, 708 N.Y.S.2d 316, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5596

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Weiss, J.), dated October 26, 1999, which granted the plaintiff’s motion to compel him to respond to the plaintiff’s notices for discovery and inspection of certain records.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly directed the defendant to respond to the plaintiffs notices for discovery and inspection of certain records, as they were material and relevant to the prosecution of the action (see, CPLR 3101 [a]; Northway Eng’g v [464] Felix Indus., 77 NY2d 332; Mirabel v State Farm Ins. Co., 265 AD2d 310; Coan v Long Is. R. R., 246 AD2d 569). Ritter, J. P., Sullivan, S. Miller, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodriguez v. Serge Elevators Co., 272 A.D.2d 463, 708 N.Y.S.2d 316, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5596 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

272 A.D.2d 463 (Rodriguez v. Serge Elevators Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Northway Eng'g v. FELIX INDUS
77 N.Y.2d 332 (New York Court of Appeals, 1991)
Coan v. Long Island Rail Road
246 A.D.2d 569 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Mirabel v. State Farm Insurance
265 A.D.2d 310 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)