Rodriguez v. Serge Elevators Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rodriguez v. Serge Elevators Co.

272 A.D.2d 463, 708 N.Y.S.2d 316, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5596

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 272 A.D.2d 463 (Rodriguez v. Serge Elevators Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rodriguez v. Serge Elevators Co., 272 A.D.2d 463, 708 N.Y.S.2d 316, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5596 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Weiss, J.), dated October 26, 1999, which granted the plaintiff’s motion to compel him to respond to the plaintiff’s notices for discovery and inspection of certain records.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly directed the defendant to respond to the plaintiffs notices for discovery and inspection of certain records, as they were material and relevant to the prosecution of the action (see, CPLR 3101 [a]; Northway Eng’g v [464]*464Felix Indus., 77 NY2d 332; Mirabel v State Farm Ins. Co., 265 AD2d 310; Coan v Long Is. R. R., 246 AD2d 569). Ritter, J. P., Sullivan, S. Miller, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Weiss, J.), dated October 26, 1999, which granted the plaintiff’s motion to compel him to respond to the plaintiff’s notices for discovery and inspection of certain records.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly directed the defendant to respond to the plaintiffs notices for discovery and inspection of certain records, as they were material and relevant to the prosecution of the action (see, CPLR 3101 [a]; Northway Eng’g v [464]*464Felix Indus., 77 NY2d 332; Mirabel v State Farm Ins. Co., 265 AD2d 310; Coan v Long Is. R. R., 246 AD2d 569). Ritter, J. P., Sullivan, S. Miller, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 A.D.2d 463, 708 N.Y.S.2d 316, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5596, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-v-serge-elevators-co-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack