Rodriguez v. SEDANO'S SUPERMARKETS
14 So. 3d 253, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9659, 2009 WL 2048925
Opinion
Upon review of Appellant’s response to this court’s June 8, 2009, order to show cause, we DISMISS this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See BEC Constr. Corp. v. Gonzalez, 383 So.2d 1093, 1094 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980) (holding if no proper claim is filed, judge of compensation claims has no jurisdiction, and therefore this court has none). Consequently, Appellant’s motion for substitution is denied as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rodriguez v. SEDANO'S SUPERMARKETS, 14 So. 3d 253, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9659, 2009 WL 2048925 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).
14 So. 3d 253 (Rodriguez v. SEDANO'S SUPERMARKETS) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
BEC CONST. CORP. v. Gonzalez
383 So. 2d 1093 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)