Rodriguez v. SEDANO'S SUPERMARKETS

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rodriguez v. SEDANO'S SUPERMARKETS

14 So. 3d 253, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9659, 2009 WL 2048925

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 16, 2009

Docket1D09-1910

StatusPublished

This text of 14 So. 3d 253 (Rodriguez v. SEDANO'S SUPERMARKETS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rodriguez v. SEDANO'S SUPERMARKETS, 14 So. 3d 253, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9659, 2009 WL 2048925 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of Appellant’s response to this court’s June 8, 2009, order to show cause, we DISMISS this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See BEC Constr. Corp. v. Gonzalez, 383 So.2d 1093, 1094 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980) (holding if no proper claim is filed, judge of compensation claims has no jurisdiction, and therefore this court has none). Consequently, Appellant’s motion for substitution is denied as moot.

DAVIS, BROWNING, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of Appellant’s response to this court’s June 8, 2009, order to show cause, we DISMISS this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See BEC Constr. Corp. v. Gonzalez, 383 So.2d 1093, 1094 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980) (holding if no proper claim is filed, judge of compensation claims has no jurisdiction, and therefore this court has none). Consequently, Appellant’s motion for substitution is denied as moot.

DAVIS, BROWNING, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

14 So. 3d 253, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9659, 2009 WL 2048925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-v-sedanos-supermarkets-fladistctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack