Rodriguez v. Sears Holdings Corporations

162 So. 3d 129, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 19599, 2014 WL 6765607
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 2, 2014
DocketNo. 1D14-1297
StatusPublished

This text of 162 So. 3d 129 (Rodriguez v. Sears Holdings Corporations) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rodriguez v. Sears Holdings Corporations, 162 So. 3d 129, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 19599, 2014 WL 6765607 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Harrell v. Fla. Construction Specialists, 834 So.2d 352, 356 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) (“We hold that the termination of supplemental benefits pursuant to ... section 440.15(l)(f)l., Florida Statutes (1995) is not a reverse offset pursuant to section 440.15(10)-”).

BENTON, WETHERELL, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harrell v. FLA. CONST. SPECIALISTS/AARLA/AGENT FOR FWCIGA
834 So. 2d 352 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
162 So. 3d 129, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 19599, 2014 WL 6765607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-v-sears-holdings-corporations-fladistctapp-2014.