Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Rodriguez v. Sears Holdings Corporations

Rodriguez v. Sears Holdings Corporations

162 So. 3d 129, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 19599, 2014 WL 6765607
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 2, 2014·No. No. 1D14-1297·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Harrell v. Fla. Construction Specialists, 834 So.2d 352, 356 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) (“We hold that the termination of supplemental benefits pursuant to ... section 440.15(l)(f)l., Florida Statutes (1995) is not a reverse offset pursuant to section 440.15(10)-”).

BENTON, WETHERELL, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodriguez v. Sears Holdings Corporations, 162 So. 3d 129, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 19599, 2014 WL 6765607 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

162 So. 3d 129 (Rodriguez v. Sears Holdings Corporations) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harrell v. FLA. CONST. SPECIALISTS/AARLA/AGENT FOR FWCIGA
834 So. 2d 352 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)