Rodriguez v. Rodriguez

264 So. 3d 409
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 1, 2019
DocketCase No. 5D17-2404; 5D17-3474
StatusPublished

This text of 264 So. 3d 409 (Rodriguez v. Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rodriguez v. Rodriguez, 264 So. 3d 409 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, Appellant challenges the amended final judgment for dissolution of marriage and the post-final-judgment income withholding for child support and alimony order ("IWO"). Having carefully reviewed the record and the briefs filed, we affirm the amended final judgment without further discussion.

*410There are, however, two errors in the IWO that Appellee concedes should be corrected. First, Appellant was ordered in the amended final judgment to pay Appellee the sum of $ 4500 per month in durational alimony through July 1, 2032, but the IWO does not presently provide a date for Appellant's employer to discontinue its withholding and remittance of money from Appellant's pay check once Appellant's durational alimony obligation ends. Second, the IWO contains an incorrect date for when Appellant's child support payment is to be reduced once his obligation to pay support for the parties' eldest child ends. The parties acknowledge that the present date of May 31, 2020, in the IWO is incorrect and should be corrected to reflect the date of May 31, 2019.

Accordingly, we affirm the amended final judgment for dissolution of marriage in all respects but remand for the entry of a corrected IWO consistent with this opinion.

AFFIRMED; REMANDED with directions.

EVANDER, C.J., COHEN and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
264 So. 3d 409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-v-rodriguez-fladistctapp-2019.