Rodriguez v. Rodriguez

176 So. 3d 1283, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 16190, 2015 WL 6554423
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 30, 2015·No. No. 5D15-789·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Rafael Rodriguez, Jr. appeals a final judgment dissolving his marriage to Valerie M. Rodriguez. He argues that he was denied due process when the trial court failed to allow him to appear telephonically for the final hearing, despite filing a proper and timely motion for a telephonic appearance. We agree and reverse.

Mr. Rodriguez, an inmate, properly apprised the trial court of his desire to attend the final hearing telephonically. The trial court erred by conducting the hearing without giving him an opportunity to appear by telephone. See Hubsch v. Howell Creek Reserve Cmty., 155 So.3d 474 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015); Johnson v. Johnson, 992 So.2d 399, 401 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008). This denied him due process. Accordingly, we reverse the final judgment and remand for further proceedings.

REVERSE and REMANDED for further proceedings.

ORFINGER, EVANDER and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodriguez v. Rodriguez, 176 So. 3d 1283, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 16190, 2015 WL 6554423 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

176 So. 3d 1283 (Rodriguez v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hubsch v. Howell Creek Reserve Community
155 So. 3d 474 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
Johnson v. Johnson
992 So. 2d 399 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)