Rodriguez v. Rodriguez

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rodriguez v. Rodriguez

176 So. 3d 1283, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 16190, 2015 WL 6554423

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 30, 2015

DocketNo. 5D15-789

StatusPublished

This text of 176 So. 3d 1283 (Rodriguez v. Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rodriguez v. Rodriguez, 176 So. 3d 1283, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 16190, 2015 WL 6554423 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Rafael Rodriguez, Jr. appeals a final judgment dissolving his marriage to Valerie M. Rodriguez. He argues that he was denied due process when the trial court failed to allow him to appear telephonically for the final hearing, despite filing a proper and timely motion for a telephonic appearance. We agree and reverse.

Mr. Rodriguez, an inmate, properly apprised the trial court of his desire to attend the final hearing telephonically. The trial court erred by conducting the hearing without giving him an opportunity to appear by telephone. See Hubsch v. Howell Creek Reserve Cmty., 155 So.3d 474 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015); Johnson v. Johnson, 992 So.2d 399, 401 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008). This denied him due process. Accordingly, we reverse the final judgment and remand for further proceedings.

REVERSE and REMANDED for further proceedings.

ORFINGER, EVANDER and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI