Rodriguez v. Robbins

Ninth Circuit

Rodriguez v. Robbins

797 F.3d 758, 2015 WL 4760566

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedAugust 13, 2015

DocketNos. 13-56706, 13-56755

StatusPublished

This text of 797 F.3d 758 (Rodriguez v. Robbins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rodriguez v. Robbins, 797 F.3d 758, 2015 WL 4760566 (9th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Counsel for Appellants/Cross-Appellees is ordered to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for the improper oral argument before this Court on July 24, 2015, based on an L.A. Times news article, published July 21, 2015, three days before oral argument in this case, entitled “Suspect was fighting deportation,” the source for which is identified as “federal authorities” and which directly references and quotes from earlier proceedings in this case. Fed. RApp. P. 46(c); Circuit Rule 46-2(a); ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct 3.5.

Counsel shall also provide the Court and opposing counsel with copies of the transcripts of the bond hearings for Mr. Keane Dean, including both the preliminary and the Rodriguez hearings, as well as any other bond hearings that may have taken place in Mr. Dean’s immigration proceedings, to which counsel also improperly referred during the July 24, 2015 oral argument.

Counsel shall have 28 days from the date of this order to respond by letter brief and to provide the transcripts.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Counsel for Appellants/Cross-Appellees is ordered to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for the improper oral argument before this Court on July 24, 2015, based on an L.A. Times news article, published July 21, 2015, three days before oral argument in this case, entitled “Suspect was fighting deportation,” the source for which is identified as “federal authorities” and which directly references and quotes from earlier proceedings in this case. Fed. RApp. P. 46(c); Circuit Rule 46-2(a); ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct 3.5.

Counsel shall also provide the Court and opposing counsel with copies of the transcripts of the bond hearings for Mr. Keane Dean, including both the preliminary and the Rodriguez hearings, as well as any other bond hearings that may have taken place in Mr. Dean’s immigration proceedings, to which counsel also improperly referred during the July 24, 2015 oral argument.

Counsel shall have 28 days from the date of this order to respond by letter brief and to provide the transcripts.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

797 F.3d 758, 2015 WL 4760566, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-v-robbins-ca9-2015.