Rodriguez v. Moreno

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rodriguez v. Moreno

78 A.D.3d 610, 910 N.Y.S.2d 904

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 30, 2010·Published

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lucindo Suarez, J.), entered March 31, 2010, which denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted.

Plaintiff s undisputed testimony establishes her entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of liability (Beamud v Gray, 45 AD3d 257, 257 [2007]). Defendants submitted no evidence to support their contention that plaintiff was comparatively negligent (see id.). Concur — Tom, J.P., Saxe, Friedman, Sweeny and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lucindo Suarez, J.), entered March 31, 2010, which denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted.

Plaintiff s undisputed testimony establishes her entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of liability (Beamud v Gray, 45 AD3d 257, 257 [2007]). Defendants submitted no evidence to support their contention that plaintiff was comparatively negligent (see id.). Concur — Tom, J.P., Saxe, Friedman, Sweeny and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.

Rodriguez v. Moreno, 78 A.D.3d 610, 910 N.Y.S.2d 904 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

78 A.D.3d 610 (Rodriguez v. Moreno) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related