Rodriguez v. MIDDLE ATL. AUTO LEASING INC.

69 N.Y.2d 874
New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 31, 1987·Published

Opinion

69 N.Y.2d 874 (1987)

Paul Rodriguez, an Infant, by His Mother and Natural Guardian, Alicia Rodriguez, et al., Appellants,
v.
Middle Atlantic Auto Leasing Inc., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided March 31, 1987.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), appeal dismissed, with costs, upon the ground that the order appealed from, which denied a motion to vacate the final determination of dismissal, does not finally determine the action within the *875 meaning of the Constitution (Le Frois Foods Corp. v Aetna Ins. Co., 74 AD2d 730, mot to dismiss appeal granted 49 N.Y.2d 1043; Til v O'Brien, 53 AD2d 1030, appeal dismissed 40 N.Y.2d 902; Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals § 36 [b], at 143-144).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodriguez v. MIDDLE ATL. AUTO LEASING INC., 69 N.Y.2d 874 (N.Y. 1987).

69 N.Y.2d 874 (Rodriguez v. MIDDLE ATL. AUTO LEASING INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Le Frois Foods Corp. v. Aetna Insurance
407 N.E.2d 480 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
Til v. O'Brien
53 A.D.2d 1030 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Le Frois Foods Corp. v. Aetna Insurance
74 A.D.2d 730 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)