Rodriguez v. Miami-Dade County Fire Rescue
This text of 1 So. 3d 1163 (Rodriguez v. Miami-Dade County Fire Rescue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND MOTION TO REMAND TO APPROVE SETTLEMENT
We originally affirmed the attorney’s fee award in this case on December 6, 2007 on the authority of then controlling precedent, notably Murray v. Mariners Health/ACE USA, 946 So.2d 38, 39 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006).
By order entered February 11, 2008, because Murray was pending review in the supreme court, we stayed issuance of the mandate, on appellant’s motion, and extended time for filing motions for rehearing to fifteen days after the supreme court’s decision on review became final.
The supreme court’s decision quashing our decision in Murray has now become final, see Murray v. Mariner Health and ACE USA, 994 So.2d 1051 (Fla.2008), dictating a different result in the present case. Accordingly, we grant Lilia Rodriguez’s motion for rehearing, reverse the decision of the judge of compensation claims, and remand the case with directions to approve the parties’ settlement.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 So. 3d 1163, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 552, 2009 WL 186004, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-v-miami-dade-county-fire-rescue-fladistctapp-2009.