Rodriguez v. Merchant
769 N.W.2d 712, 484 Mich. 870
This text of 769 N.W.2d 712 (Rodriguez v. Merchant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rodriguez v. Merchant, 769 N.W.2d 712, 484 Mich. 870 (Mich. 2009).
Opinion
Timothy Landin RODRIGUEZ and Antonio Landin Rodriguez, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
David A. MERCHANT, Michael T. Maddaloni, Stacia J. Buchanan, and Merchant & Maddaloni, P.C., Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the motions for miscellaneous relief are DENIED. The application for leave to appeal the March 4, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
769 N.W.2d 712, 484 Mich. 870, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-v-merchant-mich-2009.