Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Rodriguez v. McDonough

Rodriguez v. McDonough

932 So. 2d 515, 2006 WL 1675089
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 20, 2006
Docket1D05-3615
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 932 So. 2d 515 (Rodriguez v. McDonough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rodriguez v. McDonough, 932 So. 2d 515, 2006 WL 1675089 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

932 So.2d 515 (2006)

David RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner,
v.
James R. McDONOUGH, etc., Respondent.

No. 1D05-3615.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 20, 2006.

David B. Rodriguez, pro se, Petitioner.

Charlie Crist, Attorney General, and Linda Horton Dodson, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied; however, we vacate the circuit court's order of indigency to the extent that it imposes a lien on Petitioner's inmate trust account. See Wagner v. McDonough, 927 So.2d 216 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006).

DENIED.

ALLEN, DAVIS and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scott v. McDonough
946 So. 2d 90 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
932 So. 2d 515, 2006 WL 1675089, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-v-mcdonough-fladistctapp-2006.