Rodriguez v. Johnson

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 13, 2001·No. 01-10462·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-10462 Summary Calendar

REYNALDO T. RODRIGUEZ,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION ,

Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:00-CV-1724-Y -------------------- July 12, 2001

Before DAVIS, JONES, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Reynaldo T. Rodriguez, Texas inmate #835093, moves for a

certificate of appealability from the district court’s dismissal

without prejudice for lack of exhaustion of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254

petition. The motion for COA is DENIED AS MOOT because Rodriguez

did not timely file a notice of appeal. See Fed. R. App.

P. 4(a)(1); Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co., 459 U.S.

56, 61 (1982) (requirement of timely notice of appeal is

“mandatory and jurisdictional”). We are without jurisdiction

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 01-10462. -2-

over the appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 3(a)(1). Accordingly, the

appeal is DISMISSED.

COA DENIED AS MOOT; APPEAL DISMISSED FOR LACK OF

JURISDICTION.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodriguez v. Johnson, (5th Cir. 2001).

Rodriguez v. Johnson (Rodriguez v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.
459 U.S. 56 (Supreme Court, 1982)