Rodriguez v. Houston Corp.

Supreme Court of Florida

Rodriguez v. Houston Corp.

182 So. 2d 421

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided September 8, 1965·No. Nos. 33937, 33937-A·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for certiorari initially suggested a jurisdictional conflict of decisions. Rodriguez et al. v. Houston Corp. et al., Fla.App., 167 So.2d 746. We granted the writ but set the matter for hearing on both jurisdiction and merits.

We have heard oral arguments and have carefully examined the decision under review, together with the briefs and supporting record. We have now concluded that a jurisdictional conflict is not present, so the writ must be discharged as having been improvidently issued.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., THOMAS, ROBERTS and DREW, JJ., and KING, Circuit Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for certiorari initially suggested a jurisdictional conflict of decisions. Rodriguez et al. v. Houston Corp. et al., Fla.App., 167 So.2d 746. We granted the writ but set the matter for hearing on both jurisdiction and merits.

We have heard oral arguments and have carefully examined the decision under review, together with the briefs and supporting record. We have now concluded that a jurisdictional conflict is not present, so the writ must be discharged as having been improvidently issued.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., THOMAS, ROBERTS and DREW, JJ., and KING, Circuit Judge, concur.

Rodriguez v. Houston Corp., 182 So. 2d 421 (Fla. 1965).

Pincite

182 So. 2d 421 (Rodriguez v. Houston Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related