Rodriguez v. Houston Corp.
This text of 182 So. 2d 421 (Rodriguez v. Houston Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petition for certiorari initially suggested a jurisdictional conflict of decisions. Rodriguez et al. v. Houston Corp. et al., Fla.App., 167 So.2d 746. We granted the writ but set the matter for hearing on both jurisdiction and merits.
We have heard oral arguments and have carefully examined the decision under review, together with the briefs and supporting record. We have now concluded that a jurisdictional conflict is not present, so the writ must be discharged as having been improvidently issued.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
182 So. 2d 421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-v-houston-corp-fla-1965.