Rodriguez v. Gominiak
This text of 32 A.D.3d 1280 (Rodriguez v. Gominiak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Ralph A. Boniello, III, J.), entered May 16, 2005. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied the motion of defendant Alice Hennebohl for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against her and denied that part of the motion of defendants Peter Hirschbine, Margaret Hirschbine and Daniel Hoben for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against defendant Daniel Hoben.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present — Hurlbutt, J.P., Gorski, Martoche and Pine, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
32 A.D.3d 1280, 821 N.Y.S.2d 544, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-v-gominiak-nyappdiv-2006.