Rodriguez v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission
422 So. 2d 336, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28684
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 29, 1982·No. No. AH-296·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Rodriguez appeals the establishment of his presumptive parole release date. We affirm.
Rodriguez’ crime was committed before the adoption of the objective parole guidelines, see Rodriguez v. State, 379 So.2d 657 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). His ex post facto argument is controlled by Lopez v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 410 So.2d 1354 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).
The correct offense characteristic and salient factor score were applied.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rodriguez v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission, 422 So. 2d 336, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28684 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).
422 So. 2d 336 (Rodriguez v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
A. McD. v. State
422 So. 2d 336 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)