Rodriguez v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission

422 So. 2d 336, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28684
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 29, 1982
DocketNo. AH-296
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 422 So. 2d 336 (Rodriguez v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rodriguez v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission, 422 So. 2d 336, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28684 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

MILLS, Judge.

Rodriguez appeals the establishment of his presumptive parole release date. We affirm.

Rodriguez’ crime was committed before the adoption of the objective parole guidelines, see Rodriguez v. State, 379 So.2d 657 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). His ex post facto argument is controlled by Lopez v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 410 So.2d 1354 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

The correct offense characteristic and salient factor score were applied.

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

A. McD. v. State
422 So. 2d 336 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
422 So. 2d 336, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28684, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-v-florida-parole-probation-commission-fladistctapp-1982.