Rodriguez v. Fischer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rodriguez v. Fischer

59 A.D.3d 970, 873 N.Y.S.2d 230

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rodriguez v. Fischer. Read the opinion of the Court — 80 A.D.3d 920 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 6, 2009·Published

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County [John W Grow, J.], entered August 6, 2008) to review a determination of respondents. The determination found after a tier III hearing that petitioner had violated various inmate rules.

[971]*971It is hereby ordered that the determination is unanimously confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed. Present—Smith, J.E, Centra, Fahey, Peradotto and Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County [John W Grow, J.], entered August 6, 2008) to review a determination of respondents. The determination found after a tier III hearing that petitioner had violated various inmate rules.

[971]*971It is hereby ordered that the determination is unanimously confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed. Present—Smith, J.E, Centra, Fahey, Peradotto and Pine, JJ.

Rodriguez v. Fischer, 59 A.D.3d 970, 873 N.Y.S.2d 230 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

59 A.D.3d 970 (Rodriguez v. Fischer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.