Rodriguez v. Feinberg
This text of 359 N.E.2d 665 (Rodriguez v. Feinberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[995]*995Memorandum. The judgment of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the orders of respondent adjudging each of the petitioners in criminal contempt vacated.
In the circumstances disclosed in this record none of the petitioners was accorded an opportunity to make any statement on his own behalf or otherwise to be heard. That each was afforded an opportunity to leave the courtroom before being held summarily in contempt did not serve this purpose. In short, none of the petitioners received the minimum procedural rights to which he was entitled under our holding in Matter of Katz v Murtagh (28 NY2d 234, esp 238).
Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.
Judgment reversed, without costs, and the orders of respondent vacated in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
359 N.E.2d 665, 40 N.Y.2d 994, 391 N.Y.S.2d 69, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-v-feinberg-ny-1976.