Rodriguez v. Feinberg

359 N.E.2d 665, 40 N.Y.2d 994, 391 N.Y.S.2d 69, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3187
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 16, 1976
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 359 N.E.2d 665 (Rodriguez v. Feinberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rodriguez v. Feinberg, 359 N.E.2d 665, 40 N.Y.2d 994, 391 N.Y.S.2d 69, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3187 (N.Y. 1976).

Opinion

[995]*995Memorandum. The judgment of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the orders of respondent adjudging each of the petitioners in criminal contempt vacated.

In the circumstances disclosed in this record none of the petitioners was accorded an opportunity to make any statement on his own behalf or otherwise to be heard. That each was afforded an opportunity to leave the courtroom before being held summarily in contempt did not serve this purpose. In short, none of the petitioners received the minimum procedural rights to which he was entitled under our holding in Matter of Katz v Murtagh (28 NY2d 234, esp 238).

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.

Judgment reversed, without costs, and the orders of respondent vacated in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

S.P. v. M.P.
2022 NY Slip Op 06377 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Roajas v. Recant
249 A.D.2d 95 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
O'Connell v. Taddeo
174 Misc. 2d 110 (New York Supreme Court, 1997)
Kuriansky v. Azam
151 Misc. 2d 176 (New York Supreme Court, 1991)
People v. Webb
159 A.D.2d 289 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Werlin v. Goldberg
129 A.D.2d 334 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
LaDuca v. Bergin
86 A.D.2d 983 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
359 N.E.2d 665, 40 N.Y.2d 994, 391 N.Y.S.2d 69, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-v-feinberg-ny-1976.