Rodriguez v. Feinberg

359 N.E.2d 665, 40 N.Y.2d 994, 391 N.Y.S.2d 69, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3187
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 16, 1976·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

[995]*995Memorandum. The judgment of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the orders of respondent adjudging each of the petitioners in criminal contempt vacated.

In the circumstances disclosed in this record none of the petitioners was accorded an opportunity to make any statement on his own behalf or otherwise to be heard. That each was afforded an opportunity to leave the courtroom before being held summarily in contempt did not serve this purpose. In short, none of the petitioners received the minimum procedural rights to which he was entitled under our holding in Matter of Katz v Murtagh (28 NY2d 234, esp 238).

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.

Judgment reversed, without costs, and the orders of respondent vacated in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodriguez v. Feinberg, 359 N.E.2d 665, 40 N.Y.2d 994, 391 N.Y.S.2d 69, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3187 (N.Y. 1976).

359 N.E.2d 665 (Rodriguez v. Feinberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

S.P. v. M.P.
2022 NY Slip Op 06377 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Roajas v. Recant
249 A.D.2d 95 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
O'Connell v. Taddeo
174 Misc. 2d 110 (New York Supreme Court, 1997)
Kuriansky v. Azam
151 Misc. 2d 176 (New York Supreme Court, 1991)
People v. Webb
159 A.D.2d 289 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Werlin v. Goldberg
129 A.D.2d 334 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
LaDuca v. Bergin
86 A.D.2d 983 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)