Rodríguez v. District Court of Bayamón

44 P.R. 409
CourtSupreme Court of Puerto Rico
DecidedJanuary 18, 1933
DocketNo. 5883
StatusPublished

This text of 44 P.R. 409 (Rodríguez v. District Court of Bayamón) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Puerto Rico primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rodríguez v. District Court of Bayamón, 44 P.R. 409 (prsupreme 1933).

Opinion

Me. Justice HutchisoN

delivered the opinion of the Court,

Rodnlfo Rodriguez applied to one of the judges of this Court for a writ of certiorari, while the Court was in vacation, and appeals from an order refusing to issue the writ. The order appealed from was based: first, on the ground that the first two of the questions presented had not been properly raised either in the district court or by the petition for a writ of certiorari; and second, on the ground that the other averments of the petition did not involve any question of jurisdiction or of procedure.

The assignment of errors contained in the brief for appellant specifies errors alleged to have been committed by the district judge. It does not point out any error in the-order appealed from. That order is not even mentioned in the course of argument. In other words appellant ignores the order .and submits his case as one calling for the exercise of original rather than appellate jurisdiction.

The order appealed from must be affirmed.

Mr. Justice Wolf took no part in the decision of this case..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
44 P.R. 409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-v-district-court-of-bayamon-prsupreme-1933.