Rodriguez v. Dillon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rodriguez v. Dillon

210 A.D.2d 416, 620 N.Y.S.2d 96

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 19, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 210 A.D.2d 416 (Rodriguez v. Dillon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rodriguez v. Dillon, 210 A.D.2d 416, 620 N.Y.S.2d 96 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Nassau County District Attorney dated August 7, 1992, which denied the petitioner’s request for disclosure pursuant to the Freedom of Information Law (Public Officers [417]*417Law § 84 et seq.X the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Saladino, J.), dated December 8,1992, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The record demonstrates that the respondent satisfied its obligation under the Freedom of Information Law when it certified that after a diligent search, it could not locate certain of the documents the petitioner had requested (see, Public Officers Law § 89 [3]; Matter of Calvin K. of Oakknoll v De Francesco, 200 AD2d 619; Matter of Swinton v Record Access Officers, 198 AD2d 166; Matter of Ahlers v Dillon, 143 AD2d 225). Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Bracken and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Nassau County District Attorney dated August 7, 1992, which denied the petitioner’s request for disclosure pursuant to the Freedom of Information Law (Public Officers [417]*417Law § 84 et seq.X the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Saladino, J.), dated December 8,1992, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The record demonstrates that the respondent satisfied its obligation under the Freedom of Information Law when it certified that after a diligent search, it could not locate certain of the documents the petitioner had requested (see, Public Officers Law § 89 [3]; Matter of Calvin K. of Oakknoll v De Francesco, 200 AD2d 619; Matter of Swinton v Record Access Officers, 198 AD2d 166; Matter of Ahlers v Dillon, 143 AD2d 225). Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Bracken and Altman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

210 A.D.2d 416, 620 N.Y.S.2d 96, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-v-dillon-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack