Rodriguez v. Coughlin

167 A.D.2d 671, 563 N.Y.S.2d 248, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13607
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 15, 1990
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 167 A.D.2d 671 (Rodriguez v. Coughlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rodriguez v. Coughlin, 167 A.D.2d 671, 563 N.Y.S.2d 248, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13607 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Based on the misbehavior report and the uncontroverted hearing testimony, which revealed that petitioner was among several inmates who refused to go back inside the facility when ordered to do so and that some of those inmates had picked up bricks from the yard, it was not unreasonable for the Hearing Officer to conclude that petitioner was engaged in conduct involving a threat of violence. As such, the determination was supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Hernandez v LeFevre, 150 AD2d 954, 955, lv denied 74 NY2d 615; Matter of Taylor v Coughlin, 143 AD2d 493). In addition and contrary to petitioner’s contention, even if there were intermittent gaps in the record, reversal is not required where, as here, the alleged missing information is neither material to the determination nor of such significance as to preclude meaningful review (see, Matter of Thomas v Coughlin, 145 AD2d 695, 696; Matter of Wynter v Jones, 135 AD2d 1032, 1034).

Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Weiss, Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Malak v. State
116 A.D.3d 587 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Hynes v. Fischer
101 A.D.3d 1293 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Borrero v. Goord
268 A.D.2d 853 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Scott v. Goord
268 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Cliff v. De Celle
260 A.D.2d 812 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Gold v. Masse
256 A.D.2d 981 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
R. R. Roberts v. Selsky
255 A.D.2d 977 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Locke v. Senkowski
254 A.D.2d 553 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Torres v. Coombe
234 A.D.2d 710 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Reid v. Coughlin
219 A.D.2d 746 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
McDonald v. Coughlin
217 A.D.2d 770 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Fletcher v. Selsky
199 A.D.2d 865 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Giakoumelos v. Coughlin
192 A.D.2d 998 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Boyce v. Coughlin
191 A.D.2d 936 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Williams v. Coughlin
190 A.D.2d 883 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
167 A.D.2d 671, 563 N.Y.S.2d 248, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-v-coughlin-nyappdiv-1990.