Rodriguez v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided February 6, 2024·No. 1:23-cv-04554·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ Plaintiff, 23 CIVIL 4554 (JMF) -against- JUDGMENT COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. eK It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated February 5, 2024, Plaintiff has waived the right to object to the Report and Recommendation or to obtain appellate review. See Frank v. Johnson, 968 F.2d 298, 300 (2d Cir. 1992); see also Caidor v. Onondaga County, 517 F.3d 601 (2d Cir. 2008). Despite the waiver, the Court has reviewed the petition and the Report and Recommendation, unguided by objections, and finds the Report and Recommendation to be well reasoned and grounded in fact and law. Plaintiff's Complaint must be dismissed because it was not timely filed 1.e., within 65 days of her receipt of the Appeals Council Notice on May 3, 2022 and neither the Complaint nor the record supports a contrary conclusion. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED in its entirety; accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York February 6, 2024 RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court

BY: K MMANGO Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodriguez v. Commissioner of Social Security, (S.D.N.Y. 2024).

Rodriguez v. Commissioner of Social Security (Rodriguez v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Floyd Frank v. Sally B. Johnson
968 F.2d 298 (Second Circuit, 1992)
Caidor v. Onondaga County
517 F.3d 601 (Second Circuit, 2008)