Rodriguez v. Cherry
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-20940 Conference Calendar
JOE GAMBOA RODRIGUEZ,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
DESSIE CHERRY et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-95-CV-3831 - - - - - - - - - - April 16, 1997 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Joe Gamboa Rodriguez, #648878, moves this court for leave to
proceed in forma pauperis on appeal from the dismissal of his
civil rights complaint. On January 9, 1997, Chief Judge Politz
ordered Rodriguez to file an affidavit for leave to proceed IFP
on appeal pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995
(PLRA). The order held Rodriguez’s appeal in abeyance for 30
days pending payment of the $105 filing fee or submittal of the
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 96-20940 - 2 -
required documents pursuant to the PLRA. Rodriguez timely
responded; however, the financial documentation submitted by
Rodriguez does not comply with the requirements imposed by the
PLRA because he did not submit a signed affidavit attesting to
his assets owned, nor did Rodriguez submit information regarding
his prison trust account for the period required. See § 1915(a).
Accordingly, Rodriguez’s motion for leave to proceed IFP on
appeal is DENIED, and his appeal is dismissed for want of
prosecution. See Fifth Circuit Rule 42.3. Should Rodriguez wish
to reinstate his appeal, he is instructed to pay the $105 filing
fee to the clerk of the district court within 30 days from the
date of this order.
MOTION DENIED. APPEAL DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rodriguez v. Cherry (Rodriguez v. Cherry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.