Rodriguez v. Chamberlain

D. Nevada

Rodriguez v. Chamberlain

DecidedJanuary 4, 2024

Docket2:23-cv-01526

StatusUnknown

This text of Rodriguez v. Chamberlain (Rodriguez v. Chamberlain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rodriguez v. Chamberlain, (D. Nev. 2024).

Pincite

Opinion

Marjorie L. Hauf, Esq. 1) Nevada Bar No. 8111 Matthew G. Pfau, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 11439 H&P LAW 3| 710 South 9" Street Las Vegas, NV 89101 4) 702 598 4529 TEL 702 598 3626 FAX >| e-file@courtroomproven.com 6] Ryan Skiver, Esq. Arizona Bar No, 024552 (pro hac vice) 7| The Skiver Law Firm 3943 E. Whitton Ave. 8) Phoenix, Arizona 85018 480 626 1667 TEL 480 482 7285 FAX 10 rskiver@skiverlawfirm.com = 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 13 KEK 14) Donna Rodriguez, individually and as | Case No.: 2:23-cv-01526-MMD-BNW 15| Special Administrator of the Estate of Jessica Martinez, 16 17 Plaintiff, Stipulation and Order to Stay 18 VS, Discovery 19| CARA CHAMBERLAIN dba R&R 20 HAULERS, a Nevada Sole Proprietorship; and ROBERT JAMES 21| ITTER; and DOES I-XX, inclusive, 22 Defendants. 23 COME NOW the parties hereto, by and through their respective counsel of record, 24 hereby STIPULATE AND AGREE as follows: 25 On October 11, 2023, Plaintiff filed her Motion to Remand [ECF Doc. 10] and 26 Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [ECF Doc. 11]. On October 18, 2023, 27 Defendants filed their Reply in Support to their Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 13] and 28 -1-

1| their Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand [ECF No. 14]. On October 25, 2023, 2) Plaintiff filed her Reply in Support to her Motion to Remand [ECF Doc.16]. These 3} Motions are still pending decisions. The parties therefore STIPULATE AND AGREE as 4| follows: 5 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that the subject case will be stayed 6) pending a decision on Plaintiff's Motion to Remand and Defendants’ Motion to 7| Dismiss. Dated this 2nd day of January 2024. Dated this 2nd day of January 2024. 10 DENNETT WINSPEAR, LLP H&P LAW = 11| /s/Brent D. Quist /s/ Marjorie Hau Ryan L. Dennett, Esq. Marjorie Hauf, Esq. < 12) Nevada Bar No. 5617 Nevada Bar No. 8111 Brent D. Quist, Esq. Matthew G., Pfau, Esq. 13) Nevada Bar No. 9157 Nevada Bar No. 11439 14| Attorney for Defendants Attorneys for Plaintiff 15 "6 ORDER 17 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT DISCOVERY IS STAYED PENDING RESOLUTION OF 12 THE MOTION TO REMAND AND MOTION TO DISMISS. 9 Re ~ lea WORN, 20 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 21 DATED: 1/4/2024 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marjorie L. Hauf, Esq. 1) Nevada Bar No. 8111 Matthew G. Pfau, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 11439 H&P LAW 3| 710 South 9" Street Las Vegas, NV 89101 4) 702 598 4529 TEL 702 598 3626 FAX >| e-file@courtroomproven.com 6] Ryan Skiver, Esq. Arizona Bar No, 024552 (pro hac vice) 7| The Skiver Law Firm 3943 E. Whitton Ave. 8) Phoenix, Arizona 85018 480 626 1667 TEL 480 482 7285 FAX 10 rskiver@skiverlawfirm.com = 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 13 KEK 14) Donna Rodriguez, individually and as | Case No.: 2:23-cv-01526-MMD-BNW 15| Special Administrator of the Estate of Jessica Martinez, 16 17 Plaintiff, Stipulation and Order to Stay 18 VS, Discovery 19| CARA CHAMBERLAIN dba R&R 20 HAULERS, a Nevada Sole Proprietorship; and ROBERT JAMES 21| ITTER; and DOES I-XX, inclusive, 22 Defendants. 23 COME NOW the parties hereto, by and through their respective counsel of record, 24 hereby STIPULATE AND AGREE as follows: 25 On October 11, 2023, Plaintiff filed her Motion to Remand [ECF Doc. 10] and 26 Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [ECF Doc. 11]. On October 18, 2023, 27 Defendants filed their Reply in Support to their Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 13] and 28 -1-

1| their Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand [ECF No. 14]. On October 25, 2023, 2) Plaintiff filed her Reply in Support to her Motion to Remand [ECF Doc.16]. These 3} Motions are still pending decisions. The parties therefore STIPULATE AND AGREE as 4| follows: 5 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that the subject case will be stayed 6) pending a decision on Plaintiff's Motion to Remand and Defendants’ Motion to 7| Dismiss. Dated this 2nd day of January 2024. Dated this 2nd day of January 2024. 10 DENNETT WINSPEAR, LLP H&P LAW = 11| /s/Brent D. Quist /s/ Marjorie Hau Ryan L. Dennett, Esq. Marjorie Hauf, Esq. < 12) Nevada Bar No. 5617 Nevada Bar No. 8111 Brent D. Quist, Esq. Matthew G., Pfau, Esq. 13) Nevada Bar No. 9157 Nevada Bar No. 11439 14| Attorney for Defendants Attorneys for Plaintiff 15 "6 ORDER 17 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT DISCOVERY IS STAYED PENDING RESOLUTION OF 12 THE MOTION TO REMAND AND MOTION TO DISMISS. 9 Re ~ lea WORN, 20 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 21 DATED: 1/4/2024 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Rodriguez v. Chamberlain, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-v-chamberlain-nvd-2024.