Rodriguez v. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rodriguez v. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp.

285 A.D.2d 454, 727 N.Y.S.2d 893, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6897

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 2, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 285 A.D.2d 454 (Rodriguez v. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rodriguez v. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp., 285 A.D.2d 454, 727 N.Y.S.2d 893, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6897 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Owen, J.), dated July 13, 2000, as, upon a jury verdict finding it 100% at fault in the happening of the accident, is in favor of the plaintiff and against it in the principal sums of $100,000 for past pain and suffering and $200,000 for future pain and suffering.

[455]*455Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The award of damages to the plaintiff for past pain and suffering and future pain and suffering did not deviate materially from what would be reasonable compensation (see, CPLR 5501 [c]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Ritter, J. P., Florio, H. Miller and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Owen, J.), dated July 13, 2000, as, upon a jury verdict finding it 100% at fault in the happening of the accident, is in favor of the plaintiff and against it in the principal sums of $100,000 for past pain and suffering and $200,000 for future pain and suffering.

[455]*455Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The award of damages to the plaintiff for past pain and suffering and future pain and suffering did not deviate materially from what would be reasonable compensation (see, CPLR 5501 [c]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Ritter, J. P., Florio, H. Miller and Crane, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

285 A.D.2d 454, 727 N.Y.S.2d 893, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6897, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-v-central-hudson-gas-electric-corp-nyappdiv-2001.