Rodriguez v. Burke

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ Petitioner , 24 CIVIL 2715 (MMG)(RFT) -against- JUDGMENT MARK MILLER, Respondent. wae K

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated March 6, 2025, where no timely objections are made, the Court may adopt the R&R as long as there is no clear error on the face of the record. Sacks v. Gandhi Eng’g, Inc., 999 F. Supp. 2d 629, 632 (S.D.N.Y. 2014). The Court has carefully reviewed the record and the R&R.OF1. As there are no objections and as the Court finds no clear error in the record, the Court has hereby adopted the R&R in its entirety. For the reasons stated in the R&R, the motion to dismiss the petition as untimely is GRANTED; accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York March 7, 2025 TAMMI M. HELLWIG Clerkof Court BY: fh. Mange Deputy Clerk