Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Rodriguez v. Brown

Rodriguez v. Brown

263 So. 3d 238
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 23, 2019·No. No. 3D18-288·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

*239Affirmed. Concluding that the trial court did not grossly abuse its discretion when it vacated the default and default final judgment, we affirm. See Kathleen G. Kozinski, P.A. v. Phillips, 126 So.3d 1264, 1267 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (citation omitted) ("An order granting a motion to vacate a default final judgment is reviewed under a 'gross abuse of discretion' standard.").

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodriguez v. Brown, 263 So. 3d 238 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

263 So. 3d 238 (Rodriguez v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kozinski v. Phillips
126 So. 3d 1264 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)