Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Rodriguez v. Brown

Rodriguez v. Brown

263 So. 3d 238
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 23, 2019
DocketNo. 3D18-288
StatusPublished

This text of 263 So. 3d 238 (Rodriguez v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rodriguez v. Brown, 263 So. 3d 238 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

*239Affirmed. Concluding that the trial court did not grossly abuse its discretion when it vacated the default and default final judgment, we affirm. See Kathleen G. Kozinski, P.A. v. Phillips, 126 So.3d 1264, 1267 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (citation omitted) ("An order granting a motion to vacate a default final judgment is reviewed under a 'gross abuse of discretion' standard.").

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kozinski v. Phillips
126 So. 3d 1264 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
263 So. 3d 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-v-brown-fladistctapp-2019.