RODRIGUEZ v. BEASLEY

CourtDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia
DecidedJanuary 10, 2025
Docket7:24-cv-00025
StatusUnknown

This text of RODRIGUEZ v. BEASLEY (RODRIGUEZ v. BEASLEY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
RODRIGUEZ v. BEASLEY, (M.D. Ga. 2025).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION

HJALMAR RODRIGUEZ, JR., : : Plaintiff, : : v. : Case No. 7:24-cv-25-WLS-AGH : Warden JACOB BEASLEY, et al., : : Defendants. : _________________________________ :

ORDER

Defendant Raymond Moody filed a Notice of Stay (ECF No. 25), concerning a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition filed by Wellpath, LLC in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas. In re Wellpath Holdings, Inc., No. 24-90533-ARP (S.D. Tex. Nov. 11, 2024). Defendant Moody attached an order issued by the Southern District of Texas enforcing an automatic stay in all lawsuits “in which a Debtor is named as one of the defendants therein.” Am. Interim Order 1 n.3, In re Wellpath Holdings, Inc., No. 24-90533-ARP (S.D. Tex. Nov. 12, 2024), ECF No. 69. In addition to enforcing the automatic stay of claims against a Debtor, the Southern District of Texas also stayed claims against “Non-Debtor Defendants” such as Defendants Bradford and Shores. Id. at 2. Moreover, although the automatic stay does not extend to the remaining Defendants, the Court finds that the necessity of avoiding inconsistent results and promoting judicial economy justify staying the case as to them also. See Gulfmark Offshore, Inc. v. Bender Shipbuilding & Repair Co., Inc., No. 09-0249-WS-N, 2009 WL 2413664, at *3 (S.D. Ala. Aug. 3, 2009) (extending stay to non-debtor defendants “pursuant to the inherent powers of the Court, and in furtherance of the interests of judicial economy, consistency and justice, even in the absence of a § 362(a) stay of the claims against the [Defendants]”); Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681, 683 (1997) (“[T]he District Court has broad discretion to stay

proceedings as an incident to its power to control its own docket.”). Therefore, in accordance with 11 U.S.C. § 362(a), it is ORDERED that this case be STAYED as to ALL DEFENDANTS. Counsel for Defendant Moody is ORDERED to provide a status report regarding the bankruptcy stay and related proceedings by March 10, 2025, and every thirty days thereafter until the stay is lifted.1 SO ORDERED, this 10th day of January, 20325.

s/ Amelia G. Helmick UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1 Plaintiff filed a motion seeking leave to file an amended complaint (ECF No. 36), and a motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction (ECF No. 24), and Defendants Beasley, Emmons, Searcy, and Newsom have filed a motion for an extension of time to file answers (ECF No. 37). Those motions (ECF Nos. 24, 36, 37) are terminated. The Court will set new deadlines for filing of said motions upon lifting of the stay.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clinton v. Jones
520 U.S. 681 (Supreme Court, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
RODRIGUEZ v. BEASLEY, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-v-beasley-gamd-2025.