Rodriguez v. Barr

District Court, W.D. Virginia·Decided January 27, 2021·No. 7:20-cv-00285·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION DANIEL ANGEL RODRIGUEZ, ) CASE NO. 7:20CV00285 ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION ) WILLIAM BARR, ) By: Hon. Glen E. Conrad ) Senior United States District Judge Defendant. )

By opinion and order entered November 24, 2020, the court summarily dismissed this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), finding that the claims were barred under Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 487 (1994). Plaintiff Daniel Angel Rodriguez now moves for reconsideration of that dismissal. Having reviewed the record and Rodriguez’s motion, the court finds no grounds on which the dismissal order should be altered or amended in any way. Accordingly, Rodriguez’s motion will be denied. An appropriate order will be entered herewith. The Clerk is directed to send copies of this memorandum opinion and accompanying order to the plaintiff. _ 27th ENTER: This day of January, 2021. Fe, Core Senior United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodriguez v. Barr, (W.D. Va. 2021).

Rodriguez v. Barr (Rodriguez v. Barr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Heck v. Humphrey
512 U.S. 477 (Supreme Court, 1994)