Rodriguez v. Barnhart

108 F. App'x 657
CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit
DecidedSeptember 21, 2004
DocketNo. 04-1330
StatusPublished

This text of 108 F. App'x 657 (Rodriguez v. Barnhart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rodriguez v. Barnhart, 108 F. App'x 657 (1st Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After carefully considering the record and briefs on appeal, we affirm the judgment.

[658]*658The appellant essentially argues that the ALJ should have consulted a vocational expert before concluding that she was not disabled, given her mental impairment. Under Ortiz v. Sec’y. Health and Human Services, 890 F.2d 520, 526 (1st Cir.1989), however, the ALJ could rely on the Grid alone if her mental limitations were adequately accommodated by relegating her to unskilled work. Given the record, the ALJ could reasonably conclude that she could perform unskilled work. Se e Rodriguez v. Sec’y. of Health and Human Servs., 647 F.2d 218, 222 (1st Cir.1981).

Affirmed. 1st Cir. Rule 27(c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
108 F. App'x 657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-v-barnhart-ca1-2004.