Rodriguez v. Ashcroft
This text of 118 F. App'x 309 (Rodriguez v. Ashcroft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Hector Arturo Rodriguez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of his motion to reopen. This petition for review is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review Rodriguez’s contentions related to the BIA’s February 6, 2003 summary affirmance of an immigration judge’s denial of his application for cancellation of removal. Rodriguez did not file a petition for review within 30 days of the BIA’s decision as required by 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1) and his motion to reopen did not toll the filing deadline. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1258 (9th Cir.1996).
Rodriguez raises no other contentions in his petition for review.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
118 F. App'x 309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-v-ashcroft-ca9-2005.