Rodriguez v. Arosemena

91 F.2d 219, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 4190
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJuly 21, 1937
DocketNo. 8320
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 91 F.2d 219 (Rodriguez v. Arosemena) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rodriguez v. Arosemena, 91 F.2d 219, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 4190 (5th Cir. 1937).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal to review a judgment of the United States District Court for the Canal Zone overruling a demurrer to the jurisdiction of the court in a suit wherein plaintiffs were seeking to recover possession of some 400 mahogany logs, alleged to be worth $1,000 and for damages in the sum of $500. Plaintiffs move -to dismiss the appeal. Our jurisdiction to review judgments of the United States District Court for the Canal Zone is restrictive to final judgments in cases of this kind. Section 128, Jud.Code, as amended, 28 U.S.C.A. § 225.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Deckert v. Independence Shares Corp.
311 U.S. 282 (Supreme Court, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 F.2d 219, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 4190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-v-arosemena-ca5-1937.