Rodriguez v. Apfel
This text of Rodriguez v. Apfel (Rodriguez v. Apfel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-50359 Summary Calendar
GILBERT RODRIGUEZ,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
KENNETH S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant-Appellee.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-95-CV-598 - - - - - - - - - - December 23, 1997 Before DUHE’, DeMOSS and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Gilbert Rodriguez appeals from the district court’s judgment
affirming the denial of his application for supplemental security
income. He argues that substantial evidence did not exist to
support the finding that he was not disabled. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, the
judgment is AFFIRMED for essentially the reasons stated by the
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. -2-
district court. See Rodriguez v. Chater, No. A-95-CA-598 JN
(W.D. Tex. April 28, 1997).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rodriguez v. Apfel, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-v-apfel-ca5-1998.