Rodriguez, Nathan Thomas

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 12, 2012
DocketPD-0895-12
StatusPublished

This text of Rodriguez, Nathan Thomas (Rodriguez, Nathan Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rodriguez, Nathan Thomas, (Tex. 2012).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NOS. PD-0895-12 & PD-0896-12
NATHAN THOMAS RODRIGUEZ Appellant


v.



THE STATE OF TEXAS



ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

NUECES COUNTY

Per curiam. Keasler, and Hervey, J.J., dissent.

O R D E R



The petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.3 (b) and 68.4(i) because the original petition is not accompanied by 11 copies and the petition does not contain a copy of the opinion of the court of appeals

The petition is struck. See Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.6.

The petitioner may redraw the petition. The redrawn petition and copies must be filed in the Court of Criminal Appeals within thirty days after the date of this order.

En banc.

Delivered: September 12, 2012

Do Not Publish.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Rodriguez, Nathan Thomas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-nathan-thomas-texcrimapp-2012.