Rodriguez-Luna v. Pettiford
This text of Rodriguez-Luna v. Pettiford (Rodriguez-Luna v. Pettiford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6188
MARCELINO RODRIGUEZ-LUNA,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
M. PETTIFORD, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (3:07-cv-03398-RBH)
Submitted: June 3, 2009 Decided: June 16, 2009
Before MICHAEL and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marcelino Rodriguez-Luna, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Marcelino Rodriguez-Luna appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Rodriguez-Luna v. Pettiford, No. 3:07-cv-03398-RBH (D.S.C. Jan.
28, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rodriguez-Luna v. Pettiford, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-luna-v-pettiford-ca4-2009.