Rodriguez, Jose v. Franklin, Milas
This text of Rodriguez, Jose v. Franklin, Milas (Rodriguez, Jose v. Franklin, Milas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISMISS and Opinion Filed June 4, 2013
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-12-01322-CV
JOSE RODRIGUEZ, Appellant V. MILAS FRANKLIN, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-12-03664-D
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices O’Neill, Francis, and Fillmore Opinion by Justice Francis Before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to dismiss the appeal and render judgment.
The parties inform the Court that they have settled their differences. They ask that we vacate the
trial court’s judgment and dismiss the appeal. We grant the parties’ motion. We vacate the trial
court’s judgment signed on June 29, 2012 and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P.
42.1(a)(2).
/Molly Francis/ MOLLY FRANCIS 121322F.P05 JUSTICE S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
JOSE RODRIGUEZ, Appellant On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4, Dallas County, Texas. No. 05-12-01322-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. CC-12-03664-D. Opinion delivered by Justice Francis. MILAS FRANKLIN, Appellee Justices O’Neill and Fillmore, participating.
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court signed on June 29, 2012 is VACATED and the appeal is DISMISSED.
It is ORDERED that the parties bear their own costs of the appeal.
Judgment entered June 4, 2013
/Molly Francis/ MOLLY FRANCIS JUSTICE
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rodriguez, Jose v. Franklin, Milas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-jose-v-franklin-milas-texapp-2013.