Rodriguez-Gomez v. Gonzales
This text of 227 F. App'x 622 (Rodriguez-Gomez v. Gonzales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
We have reviewed petitioner’s response to this court’s order to show cause. We find that this petition for review should be summarily denied because petitioners’ motion to reopen violated both the numerical and time limitations on motions to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2) (providing that a party may file only one motion to reopen proceedings and that motion must be filed within 90 days after the date on which a final administrative decision was filed).
Petitioner’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied as moot.
DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
227 F. App'x 622, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-gomez-v-gonzales-ca9-2007.